I contributed to this paper (9 page PDF) - not a ton, but definitely not nothing. Here's the argument that came out of our exchanges: "We analyze several emerging tensions: the ontological crisis of human authorship, which challenges traditional copyright frameworks; the risk of 'openwashing' where proprietary models appropriate the language of the open movement," and some ethical issues. "This paper argues that the binary definition of 'openness' is no longer sufficient. We conclude that ensuring equity in the AI era requires a transition from open content creation to the stewardship of 'white box' technologies and transparent digital public goods." Now there's a lot of uncharted territory in that final statement. This paper just begins to touch on it, and (in my view) concludes without really explaining what we might mean by all that.
Today: Total: [Direct link] [Share]
