No Rich Child Left Behind, and Enriching the Rich: Why MOOCs are not improving education

Mark Guzdial, Nov 27, 2015
Commentary by Stephen Downes
files/images/1170623fb3e6068d1a1a0b05ff79a4876aa2ef839a909a3.png

I've heard this argument a lot, and here it is again: "All the evidence I know suggests that MOOC learners are typically well-educated, more affluent from the developed world, and male." OK, let's suppose that's true (it might not be). So what? First, MOOCs nonetheless provide more access than previously to people without access to education (mostly for people outside the United States, which is why they don't show up in the US-only statistics cited here). And second, it is true of pretty much all really useful things (like, say, the internet itself) that the first users are well-educated white males. That fact does not make the thing less useful. Consider another example: money. Most of it is in the hands of well-educated white males. But it doesn't follow that it would not be useful (even more useful, actually) in the hands of non-educated, non-white non-males. Image: E-learning Consortium.

Views: 0 today, 227 total (since January 1, 2017).[Direct Link]