Rutgers and ProctorTrack Fiasco: Impact of listening to regulations but not to students

Phil Hill, Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Mar 18, 2015
Commentary by Stephen Downes

We see more of the tip of what is looking like an ugly privacy iceberg, as Rutgers not only watches students through their video cameras, it charges students for the privlege. "This is a fiasco," writes Phil Hill. "Student privacy is a big issue, and students should have some input into the policies shaped by institutions. The February 12th student paper put it quite well in conclusion.... 'monitoring and recording our computer activity during online courses is not the solution, and failing to properly inform students of ProctorTrack’s payment fee is only a further blight on a rather terrible product. If Rutgers wants to transition to online courses, then the University needs to hold some inkling of respect for student privacy.'"

Views: 0 today, 192 total (since January 1, 2017).[Direct Link]