MITx: The Next Chapter for University Credentialing?
Dec 20, 2011
Commentary by Stephen Downes

An official blog and media frenzy has followed MIT's announcement that it will grant certificates for work completed using its open access learning materials. Most - like Open Culture, along with Audrey Watters in Inside Higher Ed, suggest MIT's move is in response to Stanford's Open Courses. Others, like Mashable, Edudemic and GigaOm, popint to MIT's Open CourseWare as a precursor. Mark Smithers suggests it's possibly a game-changer. Time to remove the blinders, says David Jakes. But as Tony Bates argues, there's something Johnny-come-lately about the whole thing. "I fear that some of these elite institutions in the USA are making it up as they go and are failing to base their strategies on the substantial body of knowledge, research and experience that already exists about online learning and distance education. They are coming to the party late, making a mess, and bragging about it. Hubris is the word that comes to mind. Welcome to the 20th century, MIT – now how about the 21st?" Agreed.

Following up meanwhile from Stanford's AI MOOC, we have this really interesting commentary from Rob Rambusch: "The whole drawn-on-a-napkin feel of the class was responsible for much of its charm. The napkin was visible to 160,000 people but that didn't detract from the personal nature of the learning experience." Seb Schmoller also weighs in with his final report from the course, comparing it with a pre-web course from 20 years ago: "the underlying sense of connection between students and teachers felt similar; and the way in which education would be changed irrevocably by the Internet was already apparent." Maybe we are now really learning how to set up a free school.

Meanwhile, in another thread of the same story, open content is gaining steam, according to this report in the Chronicle. Washington State announced its open course library in October, the University of Massachusetts at Amherst has been awarding faculty grants for the creation of open content, and a bill has been proposed in California to produce 50 open online textbooks. Total: 419
[Direct Link] 56854

Re: MITx: The Next Chapter for University Credentialing?

"Following up meanwhile from Stanford's AI MOOC"

Speaking of "hubris" I can't find any occurrence of Standford calling their AI Class a MOOC. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: MITx: The Next Chapter for University Credentialing?

That is great
1.- MIT is providing ONLINE courses at nominal prices
They do not provide name. Who cares. I know it is from MIT.
Even I called it TIM Certificate to me = MIT BA or BS
2.- MIT provide certificates.
ıt is OK. As long as it is from MIT I respect that more than a degree from a college .
3.- I ask MIT should charge at least $ 10 per course.
I claim annual income will be from $ 10 million to $ 1 billion in 10 years.
4.- If promoted well there will registration from 10 million people in the world.
MIT OCW is followed by 300 million people already .


That is online. That is victory of online .

That is the salvation of HE in the USA and in the world.
Do I egsagurate ? [Comment] [Permalink]

Your Comment

You can preview your comment and continue editing until you are satisfied with it. Comment will not be posted on the until you have clicked 'Done'.

Enter email to receive replies:

Your comments always remain your property, but in posting them here you agree to license under the same terms as this site CC By-NC-SA. If your comment is offensive it will be deleted.

Automated Spam-checking is in effect. If you are a registered user you may submit links and other HTML. Anonymous users cannot post links and will have their contents screened - certain words are prohibited and comments will be analyzed to make sure they make sense.