I'll just quote Mike Caulfield on this one: "I really don't think Science should publish any articles on education anymore if they think 0.07 is a 'sizable signal' -- I want to be upset but I'm more embarrassed for them. I normally wouldn't even call them out except for some reason we use a publication run by chemists and physicists to determine the education of our children, and it has been doing damage there -- embarrassingly obvious damage -- for the past 20 years."
Today: Total: [Direct link] [Share]
