Stephen Downes

This is what we might call the 'standard model' of course design: begin with outcomes, design based on expected student performance, stimulate that performance with active learning, sequence with scaffolding, and iterate based on feedback. An additional section suggests rethinking assessment because of AI. I'm not sure this standard model is used a lot in formal academia, since it's not necessarily skills or competency based, but in corporate learning I would say it's expected. I don't personally design this way because I never have a set of outcomes I expect a student to carry away with them.