A myth, in the sense intended here, is "a commonly-held but false belief, a common misconception". I think that the seven myths may be false beliefs (I have quibbles around the edges of some) but I don't think that they are commonly held. I mean, does anybody think "AI tools are neutral, objective, and unbiased?" Or that they function logically? Or that they are empathetic? That there are no social or ecological issues? I think AACE needs to do better here. Restating seven popular criticisms of AI, and branding their counterpoints as 'myths' is misleading and unhelpful. People already question these seven items. The more interesting question is what we should say about AI in the light of these criticisms.
Today: Total: [Direct link] [Share]
