As Lee Gaines writes, "More than three years after ChatGPT debuted, AI has become a part of everyday life — and professors and students are still figuring out how or if they should use it." I think the question revolves around means to an end. "What we need is students to go through the process of writing research papers so they can become better thinkers, so they can put together a cogent argument, so they can differentiate between a good source and a bad source," Cryer says. Well, yeah, I can see that. But is writing research papers the only way to become a better thinker? It seems very limited to me. In an AI-enabled would we should be a lot more hands-on, solving problems, testing solutions, that sort of thing. What is the actual work we want to be able to do? Focus on that.
Today: Total: [Direct link] [Share]
