Stephen Downes

This isn't a bad article though to be honest it also reads like an AI-authored article, though edCircuit makes no statement that it is. Authorship is unattributed. It's ostensibly about teacher professional development for working with AI, but a lot of reads like your standard 'working with AI' sort of guidance. Some things I don't agree with: treating intellectual property as an ethical issue, not a legal issue; and dependence on vendor partnerships. Also, the idea of 'teachers at the center', while no doubt appealing to teachers (and perhaps challenging for administrators) sidelines the possibility of much more student-centered learning that AI affords.