If you aren't thinking of these things, you aren't thinking ahead: "brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), neuroimaging, neural recording devices, neural decoding." We're talking maybe decades here, not centuries. And when the time comes, there will be a lot of reaction along the lines of "we should ban these completely", but they'll be too useful. Alexandra Frye says, "the potential of this technology for ethical compromise seems clear to me. Issues like privacy, consent, cognitive liberty, inequality, mental autonomy, and the risk of exploitation by bad actors are all deeply implicated." It's not clear to me that we'll have a better understanding of any of these than we have today, but that won't be for lack of opportunity. We can't just go into these debates with a list of (supposedly unassailable) ethical principles. We should be thinking about not just what we want and don't want, but how we as a society make and enact such decisions.
Today: Total: [Direct link] [Share]
