The Weak Predictive Power of Test Scores
Jay P. Greene, Education Next, May 02, 2016Commentary by Stephen Downes
The key question is "Are math and reading test results strong enough indicators of school quality that regulators can rely on them?" The evidence on this isn't clear. "There is surprisingly little rigorous research linking them to the long-term outcomes we actually care about." There is some evidence, such as this, but frankly it reads like pseudoscience. Why? "Achievement tests are only designed to capture a portion of what our education system hopes to accomplish," for example (says the author) character or life skills. And other skills (such as art or music) may be necessary for students' later-life success. "We should be considerably more humble about claiming to know which teachers, schools, and programs are good or bad based on an examination of their test scores." Agreed.
Stephen Downes
SUBSCRIBE TO OLDAILY DONATE TO DOWNES.CA
Subscribe
Web - Today's OLDaily
Web - This Week's OLWeekly
Email - Subscribe
RSS - Individual Posts
RSS - Combined version
JSON - OLDaily
Viewer
Professional
National Research Council Canada
Publications
Presentations
All My Articles
Social Network
Stephen's Web and OLDaily
Half an Hour Blog
Google Plus Page
Twitter Feed
Flickr Photos
Huffington Post Blog
Slideshare
Blip TV
Contact
Email: stephen@downes.ca
Email: Stephen.Downes@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Skype: Downes
My eBooks
