How AI replaced me
Oakland Review of Books,
2026/10/16
This is "an edtech worker's account of what got left behind." I spent most of the article what company it was she was laid off from (it's probably Kiddom, though she never says). "We're automating the humanity out of our jobs and leaving the annoying parts," she writes. "We're using technological band aids instead of meeting our issues at the source. Tech CEOs love to make sure their employees are grinding away generating AI slop. They also love to watch their employees suffer. 'Let's bring everyone back into the office. Who cares if we don't have enough desk space? Who cares if they have to commute hours at a time? Who cares if they were hired as remote employees (and paid less for it?) We have lunch and happy hours! Why aren't they more grateful?'" Via Audrey Watters.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
Make Shift
Audrey Watters,
Second Breakfast,
2026/10/16
Audrey Watters blends two things: the soon-to-be-released book Vaporware, Inc (paywalled) by David Karpf, and the twenty-year anniversary of the Shift Happens (more) video by Karl Fisch (she credits Scott McLeod). Karpf argues that the tech billionaire class is in the storytelling business. "What they're selling is not so much technology (and, my god, it's certainly not science) as much as it is story -- a story about the future that, as the subtitle of his book puts it, is their attempt to control the present." That's also what was happening in Shift Happens. "That shift could be seen in 'more' – more data, more devices, more TV viewing, more text messages, more eBay revenue, more MySpace users. More and faster. 'We are living in exponential times,' the presentation claims." It's all a sales pitch, of course, more about pumping stocks than helping humanity. "The rationale for ed-tech adoption is framed, in this storytelling and elsewhere, almost singularly about 'job readiness' marks an abdication of any other, civic or democratic mission for schools. 'We are currently preparing students for jobs and technologies that don't yet exist,' the text reads – a made-up claim that Benjamin Doxtdator countered in a marvelous essay about several years ago." She concludes, "What ed-tech has forgotten to prepare students for: their present lives. Their humanity." That's true. Of course, there's no money in that.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
Leibniz's Lost Passage on Binary Arithmetic
Lloyd Strickland,
Leibniz Philosophical Papers Project,
2026/10/16
Just one of those things I find fascinating. "In a draft of the book written between January and June 1707, he included a short passage about binary arithmetic, creation from nothing, and ancient Chinese figures associated with the Yijing (a.k.a. the I Ching). He then crossed this passage out, before a fair copy of the Theodicy manuscript was made." Taoist writings have influenced my own view of the world, and I wonder what would have followed had the binary form been popularized much earlier in our intellectual history.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
The Myth of Market Failure
Richard Gingras,
On the Evolution of Media,
2026/10/16
This is a transcript of a talk given to the Macdonald-Laurier Institute in Ottawa ddressing the causes of the decline of traditional media. I think the proposal that it was a "market failure" is a straw man; most people I read pretty much agree that the news media did not manage the transition into the digital age well at all. It was " a failure of thoughtful market assessment, a failure of imagination, and a failure of innovation." The media used to drive what people thought was a social consensus, but "did it present a true sense of our collective psyche? Or was it only a gauze hiding unresolved cultural fractures?" It's not a perfect article - the reference to Plato is wrong, for example (it was Socrates). But it does point the way to a new media - "Village demonstrates that local news can be profitable and self-sustaining without a subscription paywall, and that local advertising can serve both as a source of useful community information and as support for the local economy."
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
How NCTE Effectively Shut Down AI Resistance
Jennifer Sano-Franchini, Kofi Adisa, Megan McIntyre, Maggie Fernandes,
Inside Higher Ed,
2026/10/16
According to this opinion piece, "the National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) leadership delayed and obstructed our efforts to produce two critical resources on generative AI in the months leading to the dismantling of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC)." This action follows a lengthy dispute between the two memberships over two documents, A primer on generative AI for student writers, and Guidelines for writing teachers regarding issues of academic integrity, plagiarism and generative AI. Neither is particularly problematic, except they assert that the decision whether to use AI or not should be left to the student; the teacher's priority should be to emphasize learning. And the effect of dechartering the CCCC serves mostly to make these documents much more widely known (a phenomenon known as the Streisand Effect).
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
When AI Can Make Almost Anything, Judgment Becomes the Job
Mike Taylor,
Mike Taylor | Learning Designer, Speaker & Author,
2026/10/16
The argument here, stated about half way through the post, is that "when content becomes abundant, judgment becomes scarce." So "that is where learning professionals can bring more value." Let's think about that. A while ago I proposed a type of AI, called "deontic analytics", would decide what is worthwhile, what is valuable, what should be done. I've seen nothing that suggests AI will be incapable of this. Why would we trust human judgement over AI, if AI can be demonstrably better at this? Consider the new decision models, like Jev and Clef and Decision 1.0 (I'll be a human named that one). It's not obvious that human judgement will always be better. Image: Shadhin.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
Humanist AI Code of Conduct
Microsoft,
2026/10/16
This page contains Microsoft's Humanist AI Code of Conduct (38 page PDF), an analogy I guess to the Claude Soul document, and codifies Their "approach to developing and deploying Humanist AI, and contains the intended behaviors, values and guardrails for our models." It is motivated by the assertion that "humans must retain meaningful control over AI so that it can help people live healthier, happier, and more productive lives." That feels a bit loose to me - I would rather define for myself the purpose of my life, rather than have AI acting as though I should be productive. This looseness characterizes the document; there are numerous places where I would want to limit what AI should assume about people. I also found it interesting that Microsoft back in 2025 said it was "working towards Humanist Superintelligence (HSI)".
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
There are many ways to read OLDaily; pick whatever works best for you:
- Read in your web browser on this web page, updated weekdays
- Receive a daily or weekly email newsletter by subscribing here
- Subscribe to the RSS feed using your favourite feed reader
- Follow @OLDaily@mastodon.social on Mastodon or elsewhere in the fediverse
- Follow @OLDaily on Bluesky
- Read OLDaily as a LinkedIn Newsletter
- Integrate the open API using the JSON feed
This newsletter is sent only at the request of subscribers. If you would like to unsubscribe, Click here.
Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter? Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list. Click here to subscribe.
Copyright 2026 Stephen Downes Contact: stephen@downes.ca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.