One last chance to complete the survey telling me what work I could do is most useful and valuable to you. I've posted preliminary results, but I'm closing it Monday, and will update the article if there are any changes.
A Principled Approach as the Sands Shift
Anna Tumadóttir,
Creative Commons,
2026/09/22
I appreciate that Creative Commons is undertaking a good-faith effort to wrestle with some of the contradictions the emergence of AI has created around open licenses and open content. They conclude, "We believe in a thriving commons above all else. We believe that for a thriving commons to exist, reciprocity is required to sustain it. We believe that to encourage people to continue a full and sincere embrace of open sharing practices in this new world order, they have to have some agency. We continue to believe that copyright is not the hammer for every nail, and that new tools are needed. And we continue to believe that none of the experiments should come at the expense of public-interest uses, which must be strongly protected." I don't agree with the idea of reciprocity - as I've said before, openness and sharing are not transactions. And I don't want the model of a knowledge commons to be a transactional one.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
Renaissance AI and Education Resource Hub
Joon Suh Choi,
2026/09/22
According to the website, "We are piloting a knowledge-building library for AI agents in learning engineering. This hub curates evidence-based research, tools, datasets, and policy resources from trusted sources like What Works Clearinghouse, Evidence for ESSA, Mathematica, and the Learning Policy Institute - structured so AI agents can search, filter, and cite them directly." I can seethe usefulness of this, but once again a quick look at the literature raises more questions than answers. Why are there 169 frameworks, for example? This strikes me as a discipline less like engineering and more like creative arts. Here's the GitHub version.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
What It Takes to Build an AI Teacher
Allison Dulin Salisbury,
The Humanist,
2026/09/22
This is an interview with Tom Sayer from Ello about their effort to build what he calls an AI teacher.The premise of the article is that since teaching requires mastering many little things, all of which go into the overall task of personalizing instruction, it follows that an AI teacher won't be the product of a frontier model, but rather an assemblage of more specialist models. I don't know about that, and in the end the difference probably doesn't matter anyway. I do think from reading this article that Ello is informed by very traditionalist pedagogy. For example: "At Ello, we focus more on core skills in reading, math, and language learning. We'd love to nurture creativity alongside these core skills, but right now, we just want to teach a kid to read. That involves drilling phonics, but it also means engaging a readers' comprehension too, and developing their vocabulary; all the parts of the reading rope."
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
The Agentic Professor: Exploring GenAI-Supported Futures in Higher Education
Peter Cornillon, Xavier Prochaska,
EDUCAUSE Review,
2026/09/22
This is a long article with the challenging idea that an 'agentic professor' is something that can and maybe should exist. What I like is that the authors offer a test of the concept in the middle of the article; you can copy their prompt into an AI of your choice and see what it does. "What distinguishes the Agentic Professor envisioned here from such present-day interactions is not any single function but the combination of capabilities sustained over time: agency, longitudinal memory, pedagogical plurality, cross-disciplinary synthesis, and continuous refinement. Its significance lies not simply in providing individualized support but in creating continuity across a student's educational experience, connecting ideas, skills, and feedback across courses, disciplines, and years of study." I don't think they're wrong in the sense that something like the agentic professor is probably achievable. But I wonder if an agentic professor is what learners and people generally are actually looking for.
Web: [Direct Link] [This Post][Share]
There are many ways to read OLDaily; pick whatever works best for you:
- Read in your web browser on this web page, updated weekdays
- Receive a daily or weekly email newsletter by subscribing here
- Subscribe to the RSS feed using your favourite feed reader
- Follow @OLDaily@mastodon.social on Mastodon or elsewhere in the fediverse
- Follow @OLDaily on Bluesky
- Read OLDaily as a LinkedIn Newsletter
- Integrate the open API using the JSON feed
This newsletter is sent only at the request of subscribers. If you would like to unsubscribe, Click here.
Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter? Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list. Click here to subscribe.
Copyright 2026 Stephen Downes Contact: stephen@downes.ca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.