Finding the squishy middle (before fact-checking everything drives you nuts)

Michael Caulfield, Hapgood, Dec 28, 2016
Commentary by Stephen Downes
files/images/can.jpg

It's easy to say we should fact-check the internet (or at least that part of it pirporting to be news and information). Actually doing it is a lot harder. As Michael Caulfield says, fact-checking is boring unrewarding work. It's better shared with others. Enter annotation, as provided by (say) hypothes.is - now through the mechanism of annotation we can share our fact-checking efforts. For example, here's an annotated news article. Will this technology work where so many previous efforts at annotation have failed?

Views: 1 today, 436 total (since January 1, 2017).[Direct Link]