Count me among the globalization discontents. Not that I'm about to support Trump or Brexit or stuff like that, nor am I even opposed to freer trade and global movement of people and capital. But I am acutely aware that the net actual effect of globalization has been a direct transfer of wealth from the poorer to the wealthier. It's because only one part of globalization was ever implemented: the free flow of goods and money. "If globalization is to benefit most members of society, strong social-protection measures must be in place. The Scandinavians figured this out long ago; it was part of the social contract that maintained an open society – open to globalization and changes in technology." A strong public education system is only one part of those social-protection measures. We also need to ensure income security, health care and housing, and protection from exploitation and oppression. Without these, globalization is a sham, and should be opposed.
Image: Jorge Viale trapped in an elevator, which was on TV as I wrote this, and seemed like a perfect metaphor. P.S. I hate Twitter's new method of awkwardly showing individual tweets on top of the entire twitter stream (which of course must slowly load pictures and all) when all I want to see is the individual tweet (which disappears if I click anywhere) - stop spamming me Twitter!
Today: 0 Total: 1105 [Direct link] [Share]
View full size
