The peer review drugs don’t work

Richard Smith, Times Higher Education, May 29, 2015
Commentary by Stephen Downes
files/images/james-fryer-illustration-280515.jpg

This is an interesting way to put it: "If peer review was a drug it would never be allowed onto the market." I'm not a great Cochrane Report supporter but I think they're right here. As the article says, peer review " it is ineffective, largely a lottery, anti-innovatory, slow, expensive, wasteful of scientific time, inefficient, easily abused, prone to bias, unable to detect fraud and irrelevant."

Views: 0 today, 161 total (since January 1, 2017).[Direct Link]