U.S. Students Awful at Evaluating Reliability of Online Science Readings

Benjamin Herold, Education Week, Apr 24, 2015
Commentary by Stephen Downes
files/images/Dig-reading.jpg

This is particularly interesting in light of some of the discussions today at OEGlobal arount the topic of digital literacy. Because (to me) what good does digital literacy do for you if you are unable to reason your way out of the most basic scientific fallacy. Some of this stuff is pretty basic. "Forzani found that fewer than 4 percent of students could correctly identify the author of an online information source, evaluate that author's expertise and point of view, and make informed judgments about the overall reliability of the site they were reading." Now having said that, I wonder what standard Forzani uses to assess scientific literacy. It's not clear to me that the community as a whole has a good understanding of critical literacies.

Views: 1 today, 171 total (since January 1, 2017).[Direct Link]