The troubling psychology behind how we decide who’s a scientific “expert” — and who isn’t

Chris Mooney, Washington Post, Mar 04, 2015
Commentary by Stephen Downes
files/images/UN_Climate_Talks-02d37-1331.jpg

The trouble with experts, according to this article, is that they're unreliable (and our choice of who counts as an expert is unreliable as well). So we should let the wisdom of crowds prevail. Real scientific knowledge is emergent knowledge. "We should trust the scientific community as a whole but not necessarily any individual scientist. Individual scientists will have many biases, to be sure. But the community of scientists contains many voices, many different agendas, many different skill sets. The more diverse, the better."

Views: 1 today, 205 total (since January 1, 2017).[Direct Link]