Crowd-Sourced Peer Review: Substitute or supplement for the current outdated system?

Stevan Harnad, , Aug 26, 2014
Commentary by Stephen Downes

Many authors, writes Peter Suber, prefer to have their work reviewed in private. But this may be about to change. He writes, "The problem with classical peer review today is that there is so much research being produced that there are not enough experts with enough time to peer-review it all. So there are huge publication lags because of delays in finding qualified, willing referees."

Views: 0 today, 139 total (since January 1, 2017).[Direct Link]
Creative Commons License. gRSShopper

Copyright 2015 Stephen Downes ~ Contact: stephen@downes.ca
This page generated by gRSShopper.
Last Updated: Oct 17, 2017 07:10 a.m.