MOOC Leader EdX Turns One: What's Next?

Michael Fitzgerald, Rosa Luxemberg Siftung, Jun 30, 2013
Commentary by Stephen Downes
files/images/MOOC_canvas_01_tn.jpg

Michael Fitzgerald comes out of his experience with EdX with some concerns:

  • "I wish MOOCs had fewer problems. They can be just as flat and unengaging as a real-world lecture..."
  • "I wish MOOCs were easier to build. I wrote about Eric Lander's biology MOOC, and came away daunted by the amount of work ..."
  • "I wish MOOCs would sharply cut the cost of higher education, including at the graduate level."

But MOOCs - at least, those designed by EdX and similar initiatives - aren't designed to do any of those things. In fact, they are the opposite: they are designed to replicate traditional instruction, to depend on bespoke content, and to make someone a lot of money. See also: MOOCs: Interesting Legal Territory Ahead and read aboiut how MOOCs are designed to convert professor content into commodity content.

Views: 0 today, 129 total (since January 1, 2017).[Direct Link]
Creative Commons License. gRSShopper

Copyright 2015 Stephen Downes ~ Contact: stephen@downes.ca
This page generated by gRSShopper.
Last Updated: Dec 18, 2017 11:44 a.m.