Crowdsourcing the Future of eLearning
Based on points submitted beforehand, and the discussion at the final plenary. Paul Stacey created a slide show based on the contributions.
- it's not about e-learning, it's about we-learning. The idea that post-secondary education will be available to all worldwide.
- the idea that each Moodle institution might sponsor a new Moodle institution in a developing country. Or students in one country creating a Math 8 course for all students on Moodle. Kind of like the tutoring Grannies.
- online classes and institutions might develop local capacity by developing courses and resources for a global audience. One of the major issues this addresses is how to get people to share existing knowledge and capacity.
- it's sort of breaking out of that idea of catchment boundaries, that we're trying to serve a local audience.
- allowing students to 'friend' courses on different sites, and share forum messages from similar courses around the world.
- make learners into prosumers by giving them the tools they need to create. The idea of making students co-creators of the course, by creating definitions, wiki entries, etc.
- students can be involved in the establishment of parameters for assessment.
- students should be self-directed in the future of e-learning, picking and choosing what they take, and the manner in which they take it.
- but students still need support, they have difficulty working on their own. So there needs to be a whole set of support tools to help self-directed and self-paced learning.
- one of the things that is not done well in course design is formative evaluation, and maybe there are ways to enable students to support this.
- Martin makes a plug for the survey module, which is not widely and effectively used. This supports formative evaluation of the course.
- we will have to start trusting students more to take control of their learning, listen to their feedback, and be confident in their ability to contribute.
- maybe set up a separate instance of Moodle just for students to use
- courses of study will be planned and assignments interrelated so that at the program level students can see interconnections between multiple areas of study
- students are engaged in self-directed learning so students are focused on outcomes (but not content - the shuft away from content is a recurring theme). let them decide how they will learn and demonstrate how they have acquired the learning.
- student support in terms of personal learning plans, e-portforlios, competency profiles, self-testing, etc. Having the e-learning be personalized based on learning styles
- having students lead the learning, either on a self-directed or peer-to-peer basis
- content be thought of as being an on the side vehicle for acquiring those skills; e-learning should not be fixed to a particular resource or canonical body of resources; focused more on research in learning
- having courses that sense what students already know, so they only work on stuff they don't
- the inevitable comment that "they don't know what they don't know" and that "sometimes they need to do things they don't want to do". Yes (in response) a good teacher will disrupt thinking, to help them see what they don't know, so they want to know - it's messy, but that's what makes it personal for them (as opposed to industrial) - that's why we want activity-focused, rather than content dump
- Martin talks about a keynote by Richard Clark at the Austin Moot who did a lot about research on 'this versus that' - the things students like are not necessarily the things they are learning from
- the idea of teachers and instructors being facilitators rather than instructors
- instruction will revolve around interdisciplinary community-based projects (as opposed to the way faculty work in a fairly autonomous way) - this can be done on fully mobile devices so classroom location is not necessary
- the idea that teachers need e-training to improve online pedagogy
- creating and offering online courses will be so easy my grandmother could do it
- 'small' schools, grades 10-12, will have specialist courses, and students will have access to those specialists, and specialists from other courses
- many students will need daily contact in a structured classroom situation
- as a nursing instructor, went from being a lecturer to a tutor to a counselor - less and less need for deep knowledge of the subject, and more and more need for deep knowledge of interpersonal skills
- on the teacher as evaluator, some of the dichotomy of self-paced versus instructed comes together in the area of evaluation - the evaluation may be the challenge - is there a way the teacher can challenge the learning objectives set by the student?
- there is a fear that if we move to teacher as facilitator, that's not the same skill set teachers have now. Right now it takes a great deal of content area skill as well as facilitation skills
- being human online is essential. And we need to remember how new and unfamiliar the online environment still is to many people
- mobile learning will become the medium of choice with projected screens and keyboards. Holographic projections will replace video. Immersive tech will replace audio and video
- with cloud computing and mobile, people will use learning any place and time. People will learn when they play
- there will be a central repository of learning
- a revised user interface
- shift from a pull-from-server to a push-to-subscriber. Learning should move to the personal area network. This might help us break out fo a schedule-based top-down delivery model.
- student records, marks, courses, communication systems., etc., will all be on the same system
- eLearning will make no sense in the future, it will be standard learning with content, etc., online
- biometric authentication for test-taking
- it's a team project; the trick going forward will be will be choosing which technologies, when do we move, how far do we jump, how much do we invest
- technology when appropriate, but there's something to be said for meeting face to face. Eg. the QR codes on the badges at the Canadian e-learning conference was pretty stupid, I didn't see anyone using their phone to read the name they could read on the badge
- what about the guild model of learning, where you join the pjilosophy for life, where you always have access and community?
- we need a flexible model of credentialing where you set out your own learning path, credentials where you prove what you know, not where you learned it, a portfolio approach, skills oriented
- credentials from e-learning will be seen as a higher achievement
- continuous learning will simply be how things are done; it will be learning while earning
- is it really about how much we know, or the nature of what we know
There was some discussion about whether it was even possible to get a crowd-sourced talk like this, and obviously it worked fairly well.
SUBSCRIBE TO OLDAILY DONATE TO DOWNES.CA
Web - Today's OLDaily
Web - This Week's OLWeekly
Email - Subscribe
RSS - Individual Posts
RSS - Combined version
JSON - OLDaily
National Research Council Canada
All My Articles
About Stephen Downes
About Stephen's Web
Subscribe to Newsletters
Privacy and Security Policy
Stephen's Web and OLDaily
Half an Hour Blog
Google Plus Page
Huffington Post Blog