- My eBooks
- Ed Radio
More info
About
About Stephen Downes
About Stephen's Web
About OLDaily
Subscribe to Newsletters
gRSShopper
Threads Discussions
Privacy and Security Policy
Subscribe
Web - Today's OLDaily
Web - This Week's OLWeekly
Email - Subscribe
RSS - Individual Posts
RSS - Combined version
JSON - OLDaily
Viewer
Social Network
Stephen's Web and OLDaily
Half an Hour Blog
Google Plus Page
Twitter Feed
Flickr Photos
Huffington Post Blog
Slideshare
Blip TV
Professional
National Research Council Canada
Research Topics, Research Wiki, Code
Publications
Presentations
All My Articles
Contact
Email: stephen@downes.ca
Email: Stephen.Downes@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Skype: Downes
Scaffolding in Complex Learning Environments: What we have gained and what we have missed
Sadhana Puntambekar and Roland Hübscher,
Unknown, June 7, 2011.
The authors argue, "by broadening the scope of scaffolding (in complex learning environments) we seem to have missed some of the key features that are crucial to successful scaffolding." Scaffolding was originally defined "by Wood, Bruner and Ross (1976) as an 'adult controlling those elements of the task that are essentially beyond the learner's capacity.'" But as the concept of the scaffold is moved into the classroom context, the individualized support is not possible. There's a quite good table showing this different starting on page 12. Scaffolds have become more task-focused, more like "permanent supports." The authors write, "we would like to emphasize that a 'support' becomes a 'scaffold' only when it is adaptive, based on an ongoing diagnosis of student learning." It's a good point and an interesting point. They identify four essential features these new supports may be missing:
- an ongoing diagnosis of the learner's changing knowledge and skills
- the dynamic and adaptive support provided to an individual learner
- a transfer of responsibility from the "scaffolder" to the "scaffoldee."
- scaffolding that is provided is based on an analysis of the process.
Via Stian Håklev, who also offers a summary of the article. (Hits Today: 1 Total: 1575)
[Direct Link] [Tags: none]
Comments
Re: Scaffolding in Complex Learning Environments: What we have gained and what we have missed
Didn't Vygotsky come up with the concept of scaffolding with his "zone of proximal development"? [Comment]
[Permalink]
[Previous][Next]
Re: Scaffolding in Complex Learning Environments: What we have gained and what we have missed
As the article states, "The notion of scaffolding has been linked to the work of soviet
psychologist Lev Vygotsky. However, Vygotsky never used the term scaffolding, but
believed that learning first occurs at the social or interindividual level and emphasized the
role of social interactions as being crucial to cognitive development." [Comment]
[Permalink]
[Previous][Next]
Your comments always remain your property, but in posting them here
you agree to license under the same terms as this site
(CC By-NC-SA). If your comment is offensive it will
be deleted.
Automated Spam-checking is in effect. If you are a registered
user you may submit links and other HTML. Anonymous users cannot
post links and will have their content screened - certain words are prohibited
and your comment will be analyzed to make sure it makes sense.
