The paper draws on a definition of innovation ("a concept which should amalgamate both technological novelties (tools, programs, hardware, etc.) and sociological novelties (target audience, social integration, social interaction) and also the improvements in the quality of the service (educational improvement, learning support, teaching support, etc.)") and proposes an evaluation mechanism accordingly. I don't think it's a really complete assessment; the diffusion of innovation, as discussed today by Karl Kapp, also deserves attention. And deliveresy-specific criteria, such as "student satisfaction", should not be employed. More articles from the current elearningpapers issue on innovation and creativity.
Today: 0 Total: 1100 [Direct link] [Share]
