How can you take a report that talks about how plugged in today's students are and turn it into a paean to traditional classroom education? I don't know, but the Chronicle manages with its usual anti-technology agenda. In typical fashion the article presented here manages to completely avoid the point of the study it quotes while furthering its own narrow view. If you get the impression that I am tired of such blatant misrepresentation from the press, you're right.
Today: 0 Total: 358 [Direct link] [Share]
