- My eBooks
Current song: Loading ...
About Stephen Downes
About Stephen's Web
Subscribe to Newsletters
Privacy and Security Policy
Web - Today's OLDaily
Web - This Week's OLWeekly
Email - Subscribe
RSS - Individual Posts
RSS - Combined version
JSON - OLDaily
Stephen's Web and OLDaily
Half an Hour Blog
Google Plus Page
Huffington Post Blog
National Research Council Canada
Research Topics, Research Wiki, Code
All My Articles
A Response to "Where Do We Go From Here?"
Gary BrownÃ¢â¬â¢s Critical Reading article, "Where Do We Go from Here?" (2000) is a nicely stated expression of a sentiment that probably has widespread currency. It is precisely because of this fact that his argument is troubling.
Taking the Chronicle of Higher Education as his starting point, indeed, as his "bellwether of the academy," Brown examines online learning from a pedagogical perspective and asks, pointedly, "How do these products improve instruction? Where is the articulation of the critical marketing angle for a product that helps faculty promote deeper learning?" Of course, one does not find the answers to such questions in the Chronicle. But this is hardly the fault of the discipline. My own estimation is that the Chronicle is probably not a particularly good source; most of what is happening in online learning is happening outside the traditional circles typically reported by the Chronicle.
My own response (1999) in a Chronicle forum to a recent article is a case in point. Critics of online learning James Perley and Denise Marie Tanguay (1999), in an article printed by the Chronicle, have endorsed the attitude that the professorÃ¢â¬âand only the professorÃ¢â¬âshould be the prime determinant of content and pedagogy. I ask, "One wonders what gives a tenured professor a unique insight into teaching at all. Course packs, for all their weaknesses, have at least the steady hand of a professional educator to guide them in their content and delivery."
A sentiment similar to those of Perley and Tanguay is expressed by Mathieu Deflem (1999) (a cause celÃ¯Â¿Â½bre trumpeted by Florence OlsenÃ¢â¬â¢s  article in the Chronicle). In a position paper posted on his own Web site, he even goes so far as to say of online learning that "This form of intrusion goes completely against our position as educators for which we claim sovereign rights and obligations."
If we look at education from the perspective of the solitary professor, a point of view these authors are taking, then not much is happening from the point of pedagogy or even content. But looked at in a wider context, where we see online learning taking the form of team-produced and team-taught multimedia productions, then significant changes are occurring, if only because the actors are changing.
For example, I did a search for "constructivism" on the Chronicle site (the free site, because I don't want to purchase a subscription) that returned zero matches. But as evidenced by startups like UNext, constructivism is emerging as the dominant paradigm of online learning. Now I am no prophet of the One True Faith (unlike, say, Alex Riegler ) but I do consider the shift in emphasis to student-centered learning to be of pedagogical significance.
I think the basis in the Chronicle's account of the online learning phenomenon represents a certain bias. While it probably represents the collective voices of tenured academia teaching as lone eagles in front of ever larger classrooms, it does not represent the many voices of people using new technology in new ways, and as such misses an important opportunity to respond to the pedagogical question at all.
Brown, G. (2000, January/February). Where do we go from here? The Technology Source. Retrieved 28 January 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/reading/2000-01.asp
Deflem, M. (1999, October 2). University4Sale.com: The educational cost of free lecture notes on the Internet. Retrieved 28 January 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.sla.purdue.edu/people/soc/mdeflem/znotes.htm
Downes, S. (1999, October 26). Response to James Perley and Denise Marie Tanguay. The Chronicle of Higher Education Online. Retrieved 28 January 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.chronicle.com/colloquy/99/online/46.htm
Olsen, F. (1999, October 6). Armed with a Web site and links, a professor takes on lecture-notes companies. The Chronicle of Higher Education Online. Retrieved 28 January 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://chronicle.com/free/99/10/99100601t.htm
Perley, J. and Tanguay, D.M. (1999, October 29). Accrediting on-line institutions diminishes higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education Online. Retrieved 28 January 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.chronicle.com/colloquy/99/online/background.htm#perley
Riegler, A. (2000) Radical constructivism. Retrieved 28 January 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.univie.ac.at/cognition/constructivism/index.html
UNext Corporation (2000). UNext. Retrieved 28 January 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://www.unext.com/
You can preview your comment and continue editing until you are satisfied with it. Comment will not be posted on the Stephen's Web until you have clicked 'Done'.
Your comments always remain your property, but in posting them here
you agree to license under the same terms as this site
(CC By-NC-SA). If your comment is offensive it will
Automated Spam-checking is in effect. If you are a registered user you may submit links and other HTML. Anonymous users cannot post links and will have their content screened - certain words are prohibited and your comment will be analyzed to make sure it makes sense.