- My eBooks
Ed Radio
Current song: Loading ...
Stream title:
Bit rate:
Current listeners:
Maximum listeners:
Server status:
AutoDJ status:
Source connected:
About
About Stephen Downes
About Stephen's Web
About OLDaily
Subscribe to Newsletters
gRSShopper
Threads Discussions
Privacy and Security Policy
Subscribe
Web - Today's OLDaily
Web - This Week's OLWeekly
Email - Subscribe
RSS - Individual Posts
RSS - Combined version
JSON - OLDaily
Viewer
Social Network
Stephen's Web and OLDaily
Half an Hour Blog
Google Plus Page
Twitter Feed
Flickr Photos
Huffington Post Blog
Slideshare
Blip TV
Professional
National Research Council Canada
Research Topics, Research Wiki, Code
Publications
Presentations
All My Articles
Contact
Email: stephen@downes.ca
Email: Stephen.Downes@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Skype: Downes
Apple bars 'all single-station radio apps' from iPhone
November 26, 2010
Commentary by Stephen Downes
Reports (more) that Apple is banning single-station apps on the iPhone (and hence, iPad, etc). Apple began rejecting single-station radio apps on November 10, declaring that it "will no longer approve any more radio station apps unless there are hundreds of stations on the same app." This is because "single station apps are the same as a fart app and represent spam in the iTunes store" (Yes, this is the very first time the word fart has appeared on this website). Could this be coming for, say, newspaper sites too? Maybe they could bundle all the news sites into a single app. Call such an app, oh, I don't know, a 'web browser'.






Re: Apple bars 'all single-station radio apps' from iPhone
Frank Lowney, November 28, 2010
With 300K app in the App Store, I can understand why they want to reduce that number. As you point out, the combination of web browsers and news web sites that detect and adjust to various sized devices should be sufficient. So we shouldn't mourn the loss of these apps any more than those apps that were for calling a single person. I believe that those are long gone.
However, there may be something more at work here. Watching the apparent collaboration between Apple and News Corp., one might suspect that new standard file formats for newspapers and magazines might be proposed sometime soon. These would directly compete with the ponderous proprietary solutions offered by Adobe.
A new newspaper file format might be based upon the current EPUB standard adding things such as multi-column layout.
A magazine file format based upon EPUB would be a little harder to do but not inconceivable when one considers the effort now underway to define EPUB 3.0.
The newspaper/magazine-as-application is a poor model for the post-print world because they defeat archiving and search. Imagine an historian 50 years post print trying to figure out what we were all about. As a usable chronicle of culture, the app is useless.
Here's an official indicator of where EPUB is headed:
Working Group Charter – Approved 5/24/10:
http://www.openebook.org/idpf_groups/IDPF-EPUB-WG-Charter-5-24-2010_Approved.html
[Comment] [Permalink] [Previous][Next]
Your Comment
You can preview your comment and continue editing until you are satisfied with it. Comment will not be posted on the Stephen's Web until you have clicked 'Done'.
Your comments always remain your property, but in posting them here you agree to license under the same terms as this site (CC By-NC-SA). If your comment is offensive it will be deleted.
Automated Spam-checking is in effect. If you are a registered user you may submit links and other HTML. Anonymous users cannot post links and will have their content screened - certain words are prohibited and your comment will be analyzed to make sure it makes sense.