Stephen's Web

Reading the Future

I'm not really sure what to make of the CCL's report on literacy, the one released this week with the catchy assertion that Canada's literacy rate will not improve in the years ahead. Some bits are just odd. For example: literacy in old people is lower than literacy in young people. OK, that makes sense. But (p.4) these rates haven't changed in a decade. Well, how does that happen - do we knock off literate people as they turn 66? Or is there something about the testing that represents older people as more illiterate than they used to be? And what about the testing (pp. 24-25) that requires people to read random letters, read pseudo-words, repeat words and repeat digits, all as quickly as possible? The presumption seems to be that testing the putative components of reading constitutes testing reading - a questionable assumption at best. Are we as Canadians really as bad as the report suggests? Unattributed, Canadian Council on Learning, June 13, 2008. [Link] [Tags: Canada] [Previous][Next]

Comments

Re: Reading the Future

Anymouse, June 17, 2008

If you're asking me, as an American...

(I have to say that I don't feel I'm on very solid ground with that joke given the last eight years and our current dollar value) [Comment] [Permalink] [Previous][Next]

Comment

You are not logged in. [Login]

Title
Description

Your comments remain your property, but in posting them here you agree to license under the same terms as this site (Creative Commons). If your comment is offensive it will be deleted.

Automated Spam-checking is in effect. If you are a registered user you may submit links and other HTML. Anonymous users cannot post links and will have their content screened - certain words are prohibited and your comment will be analyzed to make sure it makes sense.