[Home] [Top] [Archives] [About] [Options]

OLDaily

Hope for the Future
Audrey Watters, Hack Education, 2022/03/09


Icon

I always have time for Audrey Watters, even when she's being upbeat, as she is - in a way - in this article. I think there's something to the idea of the 'grammar of schooling' that she talks about, and the role history plays in shaping that, though I also want to think about changing schooling by changing the grammar. I've written about that elsewhere. And I also wish she's name names in her articles. Not so much her inspirations and influences, like hooks, Freire and the rest, but the "people in education and education technology, who've not only screwed up the tools and practices of teaching and learning over the past year or so, but who have a rather long history of bad if not dangerous ideas and decisions." Because I'm a font of self-doubt I read these articles asking "Is it I?" but I really don't think it is - which means if true there's a whole other history of ed tech to talk about, the history I'm living and writing. No?

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]


Experts and Explanations
Clark Quinn, Learnlets, 2022/03/09


Icon

It feels odd to read this post, because it's clear that while Clark Quinn understands that expert knowledge isn't composed of easy-to-read explanations, he continues to write as though experts 'compile' and 'store' their knowledge as though they were computers. But because what they know can't be articulated, he reasons, they are therefore bad teachers. "It's clear that experts should not be the ones doing the explanations...  Don't give experts the job of communicating to anyone but other experts, or to experts on working with experts to get explanations." Maybe the problem is with the demand for easy-to-grasp 'explanations'. These may be easier to teach, but it may be that they are the wrong thing to teach.

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]


What is the future of assessment and feedback?
Sarah Knight , JISC, 2022/03/09


This article introduces a guide that describes seven principles for good assessment and feedback (quoted):

Nothing radically new but still useful. P.S. Isn't it time students in stock photos each got their own computer, instead of having to share a screen?

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]


About the AIS Consortium
AIS Consortium, 2022/03/09


Icon

The Adaptive Instructional Systems (AIS) consortium is a not-for-profit organization formed under the IEEE Industry Standards & Technology Organization (ISTO) "to promote the development and adoption of effective AIS solutions and to support the industry and organizations that produce them." Its Global Learning Toolkit (GLT) is available at their GitLab site, though it appears you have to be approved for access (ditto the Mattermost discussions). "The GLT is an open AIS framework available to the public and intended for commercial use" and "is a forked baseline of the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT)." Image: Sottilare, et.al.

Web: [Direct Link] [This Post]


This newsletter is sent only at the request of subscribers. If you would like to unsubscribe, Click here.

Know a friend who might enjoy this newsletter? Feel free to forward OLDaily to your colleagues. If you received this issue from a friend and would like a free subscription of your own, you can join our mailing list. Click here to subscribe.

Copyright 2022 Stephen Downes Contact: stephen@downes.ca

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.