Chris Lott is concerned that I don't link to him enough and he's concerned that I misinterpreted his post on open content. Regarding the former, there is no anti-Lott campaign, I simply read what comes in and evaluate items on their merits, as I see them. As to the latter, he writes, "There are only two narrow 'defenses' involved: the importance of continuing to share content and the help that the OCWC has been in facilitating that activity." Well maybe. Readers can judge for themselves. David Wiley also comments (and to him I will want to one day tell stories about the days I spend in the sandpile out back with my toy cars, building cities and dreaming of the best way to build better roads...).