My Canada

In the days of the nation-wrenching referenda on the separation of Quebec half a generation ago, many federalists adopted the slogan, "My Canada includes Quebec."

As a slogan, it wasn't particularly effective. But it captured two essential features of the new Canada we are just beginning to see: the idea of ownership, in the sense that what this nation is becoming belongs to us, is even a part of us; and the idea of inclusion, a recognition that while the Quebecois may dress funny, speak funny, and are, even, a nation unto themselves, their loss would diminish what we have been building together.

Happily, the majority of Quebecois agreed, and so this nation remains a part of the larger political entity, and so we as a whole were able to continue in this noble project of redefining ourselves as a country.

What we are seeing today is the beginning of the fruits of our labour. We set out to build a nation based not on a particular language or culture or even a particular geography, but as a set of background assumptions and institutions. Our national character is defined not by some fundamental founding document and predefined identity but rather by the institutions and measures we take in order to ensure well-being and harmony among our people.

To Canadians, especially young Canadians, as a recent Globe and Mail series observed, this new sense of identity is almost second nature. "They are the most deeply tolerant generation of adults produced in a nation known for tolerance," writes the Globe. "They live, as one young woman observed, what their parents had to learn."

Some commentators, such as a recent Washington Post article on our new-found identity, attribute our good fortune to luck. "America invented itself," writes the author. "Canada sort of happened."

But there is more than that, much more. If you look at the sort of things we have been able to accomplish over the last twenty years or so, it becomes evident that the Canada of today is the result of the dedication, sweat and sacrifice of millions of individuals.


We provide the essentials of life, including health care, to every person in the country. When polled, Canadians routinely report universal health care as our crowning achievement, definitive of national identity. But it is more than that: social welfare is available in every province, unemployment insurance is available to every worker, and the Canada Pension Plan (or Quebec Pension Plan) ensures that our old can live in dignity.

Parliament Buildings
Canadians are safe and secure in their own cities and towns. Think about it: it is possible for me to walk, without fear, through the streets of Canada's largest city, a population of 4 million, in safety. Canada has accomplished this through firm but gentle policing (one t-shirt available at the border bears the slogan, "Canada: Land of Polite Police"), strict gun laws that keep their presence to a minimum despite a constant inflow from south of the broder, the abolition of the death penalty, and more.

Canada's legal system benefits from a fair and tolerant legal regime. Much has been made of our recent flirtation with the legalization of marijuana and our outright legalization of gay marriage. But these are the end results of a system of legislation and enforcement which, in recognition of prevailing (though still minority) trends in the country, has come gradually to reflect our diversity.

Even twenty years ago, the simple possession of marijuana was not strictly enforced and warranted only small fines. Being gay or lesbian has been legal for as long as I can remember. Gay pride parades are an occasion for celebration, and often include the mayor and other politicians. The Marijuana Party - which advocates the legalization of marijuana - is a legal (though fringe) political party and its B.C. leader, Marc Emery, smoked pot on the front steps of the Toronto police station last week.

But we have gone beyond mere social security and safety. We have, as numerous commentators have reported, embraced the idea that we are a multicultural country. This is something that goes well beyond mere tolerance: it is something that we encourage and celebrate. Alberta, for example, has a reputation of being right-wing and intolerant. But in the capital, Edmonton, the annual Heritage Festival attracts more than 6,000 volunteers, 50 cultural pavilions, and 350,000 visitors - in a city of 900,000.

I could go on - I could talk about Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, I could talk about Canada's contribution to the world in the form of peace-keeping, human rights overservers, mine sweepers, doctors and health care workers, and more. I could talk about our advances in science and technology - we were the third country to launch a satellite, we have the world's highest free-standing structure, we have the world's fastest (by far) internet. I could talk about how Canadians have contributed to the world of culture and literature.

Or I could talk about myself. I could talk about how, as a child, I was taught that Canada resembles a "salad bowl," in which each ingredient maintains its distinctiveness and yet contributes to the whole. I could talk about growing up in an environments where my parents and teachers asked me to please not fight with the French and with the Catholics (diversity was something different then). I could talk about being poor, living on Canada's welfare system, and slowly, determinedly, taking a tentative foothold on each rung this caring society offered me to make something more of myself. I could talk about being a long-hair all my life, being a radical, being, at times, very angry, and yet still obtaining employment, still sitting on committees and boards, still being respected on the basis of my opinions and my contributions to society.

We, as a nation, have evolved slowly. In contrast to the American dictum of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," we have (informally, in a typically Canadian way) adopted the slogan, "peace, order and good government." Such an objective is not built with sweeping reforms and grand principles, it is built, a piece at a time, on a framework of institutions and associations. But if I had to identify the keys that make such a society possible, I would narrow down to two major things: the elimination of need, and the empowerment of the individual.

In his important work, The Struggle for Democracy, Patrick Watson clearly delineated the relationship between wealth and governance. It is not possible to exercise one's rights or civil liberties while at the same time in a state of poverty and need. The more one's sustinance is dependent on conformity with to some established order, the less one is likley to be able to take into one's own hands the means to challenge that order. Democracy requires a certain level of prosperity in each of its citizens.

There has been much discussion in my field about the means to best provide an education to the disadvantaged people of the nation and of the world. How astonishing that the single, most basic, most effective means is so often overlooked: feed them. Learning, progress, empowerment - none of these are possible in a system where one's basic well being is under seige.

The second major principle is the empowerment of the individual. This includes - but of course is not restricted to - their enfranchisement. It was a long struggle in Canada to grant all adults the vote, and it is an even longer struggle to grant to them access to those institutions that would allow them to make a difference. The Globe and Mail notes that young Canadians are abandoning the ballot in droves: but it notes (though only in passing) that they are instead taking the management of their community and country directly into their own hands.

The empowerment of the indvidual is not accomplished externally. It is not something that can be given to you: you have to obtain it for yourself. In the last twenty years, we have seen this principle demonstrated ona global scale: the people of the Philippines, of Korea, of Eastern Europe, of Argentina and Brazil, have shown us that liberation comes from within. The sad experiences of Haiti, Somalia, and more recently, Afghanistan and Iraq, show that it cannot be purchased from without.

In the individual and communitarian sense, the empowerment of the individual means giving that individual the space (and the means - see the first principle) to find, and express, their own identity, to realize their own potential. What we have seen in this nation is that people find their identity in a myriad of ways, some, by preserving and promoting their culture, others, by the free expression of thought and empotion in literature, art or song, others, through an affinity with a higher power, with their ancestors, or with the natural world, and still others by souping up, jacking and racing a Camero.

This is our Canada, a project still not complete - so far from complete - but a magnificant achievement that is a testament, a living legacy, to the dreams and aspirations of so many who have gone before.

This - after all - was not an accident. It was planned, a very deliberate, not fully formed but idealistic vision of what life in a paradise could be like if we would only begin to live the dream toward which we aspired. It is the nation that took former Prime Minister's Pierre Trudeau's comment, "The state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation," quite seriously, quite literally, and which saw the next generation of sexual orientation activists work - and live - in a manner befitting that ideal.

It is a nation in which, in the mid-1980s, I came to be employed by the Arusha Centre, a development education centre, in Calgary. Over two years with Arusha and the Development Education Coordinating Council of Alberta (the layers of committees and organizations is typical - governance being as important as outcome), I was exposed to the Hedleys, who had worked as teachers for two years in Brazil, to activists returning from construction tours in Nicaragua, to Philippine immigrants trying to organize a community beauty pageant, to the Chilean exile community, to Salvadoran guitarists, and most of all, to hundreds of ordinary bread-and-butter Canadians working with these communities, trying to understand their needs, and helping them to join Canadian society or return home, whichever they preferred.

It is a nation in which the national student press, CUP, did 20 years ago (and still does) promote itself as an agent of social change. The debate was never about whether our society should be improved, nor even about whether it should be a more diverse, more caring, and more supportive society, but rather, of how this was to be achieved and what role the press - student and mainstream - should play in that effort. Former CUPpies have scattered through society, the years of effort expended in such discussions being reaped a generation later in a harvest of enlightened leadership.

Over the years, as I have lived and worked in five provinces of this great country, and have travelled through the other five (and a territory), I have met not hundreds but thousands upon thousands of people, working in their own niche, serving on volunteer committees, staffing booths and telephone lines, donating their money, working for NGOs instead of corporations, working as a fifth column within corporations, sacrificing, sweating, but most of all living heart and mind in the Canada we now see ascendant.

And it is working. Our young people "are pursuing democracy in the workplace and in marriage. They are a global generation, committed to issues of tolerance and social justice. They are a generation led in so many ways by its women. They are, of course, the best-educated generation the country has ever produced, possibly the best-educated generation of young adults in the world. Look at them on the streets. Love is bubbling across racial and ethnic lines, and the Canadian post-ethnic identity is on its way to reality.

"And always keep this in mind about them, because it is the generation's most significant characteristic: They are not a sudden sociological phenomenon; they are a generation whose values have evolved from those of the generations preceding them."

If you look on the streets, in the schools, in the community centres and beyond, in the forests, in Katimivik, you will see this younger generation building something even greater. A few days ago, for example, I read of two young students at Mount Allison University who, as their summer employment, obtained a grant and some funding and established a community garden in the town of Sackville. Their garden, explained the students, wasn't just about organic gardening - though it was partially about that. It was about community involvement and organization.

In the dressing room of the Montreal Canadiens, a hockey franchise storied with glory and tradition, a placard on the dressing room wall reads, "NNos bras meurtris vous tendent le flambeau, a vous toujours de le porter bien haut." And as is the custom, the translation: "To you with failing hands we throw the torch. Be yours to hold it high." It is, of course, a line from the poem, In Flanders Fields, by John McCrae. It is a poem, and an idea, that resonates with Canadians, signifying not only the sacrifice Canadians have made, but the reasons why they made it.

Last week, I had the privilege of listening to former general Romeo Dallaire describe the horror faced by and witnessed by Canadian peacekeepers as the slaughter of 800,000 people broke out and as the intervening forces withnessed, and were shot at, by child soldiers using today's lightweight automatic rifles. Do you shoot children? Or do you allow them to, one by one, kill the civilians you are trying to protect? "The sergent remembers clearly - digitally clearly - the moment he gave the order," recalled Dallaire. "The soldier remembers clearly - digitally clearly - pulling on the trigger, the cartridge flying up in an arc, the child's head exploding..."

I want you to understand this. I want you to understand not only the glorious side of Canada's new revolution, a quiet revolution that began on the battlefields of Europe, carried forward in the church basements of Saskatchewan and the student press of Quebec. I want you to understand that there have been casualties, civilian and military. I want you to understand that people - people like Dallaire, and many hundreds of thousands more - have dedicated their lives and paid the price for this, our new National Dream.

We stand on guard

Sometimes the price is, as it has been for so many soldiers, one's life. Sometimes it is, as it was for Canadian doctor Norman Bethune, a lifetime in a foreign land. Sometimes it is, as was the case for Pierre Trudeau and so many others, the unrelenting call of civil service. And sometimes, as in the case of Dallaire and his troops, the price is paid in the knowing and the remembering.

I remember, in 1988, running for a couple of kilometers alongside the Olympic Torch as it passed through Edmonton on its way toward the Calgary games. As we made our way into Hawrelek Park, I was able to reach up, and place my fingertips along the side. I remember it being a light tan brown and a rough, carved surface. And I felt, from the torch into my self, the sense of belonging, of achievement, of idealism, pass.

My experience of the Canadian dream is much like that. I am close enough to touch it and into my life it breathes. I wrote, in an interview last year (and in my Personnel review at work), the following, which I have now posted on my web page:

"I want and visualize and aspire toward a system of society and learning where each person is able to rise to his or her fullest potential without social or financial encumberance, where they may express themselves fully and without reservation through art, writing, athletics, invention, or even through their avocations or lifestyle. Where they are able to form networks of meaningful and rewarding relationships with their peers, with people who share the same interests or hobbies, the same political or religious affiliations - or different interests or affiliations, as the case may be. This to me is a society where knowledge and learning are public goods, freely created and shared, not hoarded or withheld in order to extract wealth or influence. This is what I aspire toward, this is what I work toward."

Jeff Kerr once remarked, back in the halcyon days when I worked at Assiniboine Community College, pushing for online learning for their students and especially for those at Kerr's Brandon Adult Learning Center, that "You take such risks!" In the sheltered clime of organizational culture, perhaps. But when looked at alongside those of my compatriots, the risks I took - and still take - are nothing.

And yet still you might ask, you might wonder, why? Why this? And partly it's the deep sense of urgency prompted by the European wars, by the African wars, by the cries of the people in Ethiopia and East Timor. And partially its the example set by people like Pearson and Trudeau, Bethune and Banting (and so many more). But behind that, behind all of that, this:

I think back to the days when I still taught philosophy, when a student asked the inevitable question, "What is the meaning of life." And I thought about it for a while, and I thought about the time, a couple days earlier, I was walking through the streets of Strathcona, and I heard the children laughing in the nearby schoolground, the wind lightly rustling through the trees, the blue skies and the while clouds, and the perfect sense of harmony I felt at that moment.

And I think about the perfect days. Sliding through glassy moonlit waters over Lake Christie at Camp Opemikon, listening to the laughter of the loon through a spotless, starry night. Or sitting by the shores of Lake Superior on a sultry August afternoon, watching the storm clouds roll through the sunset on the horizon. Or just sharing my front porch with my cat, watching the neighbourhood go by, the sound of happy conversation wafting from Mountain Road, the robins foraging in my front lawn, the maple swaying gently overhead.

In diversity, harmony.

This, this is my Canada. My home. My love. My life. My dream.

Share |


While absolutely wrong universally

While absolutely wrong universally accepted at sometimes a high rate of the well consumer a high level[url=].[/url] [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

what is wrong with real canadian born Canadians? when will Canadians stop alowing people from other countries to be running the government in Canada. the government in Canada should be run only by Canadians born in Canada People from other countries are welcome in Canada but if they want to run government they should do so in their own countries. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

Yes, I get to Montreal from time to time - I was there a couple weeks ago. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

I'm thinking this could be a great way to frame a course on Canadian history, which I happen to be teaching this coming school year. Even better would be if, after reading this, my students could get a chance to meet who wrote it. You ever in the Montreal area? :)

ps - I am logged on as 48735?
I am Tracy Rosen [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

say79, you are discussing whether or not the Canadian military is big, powerful and well-equipped.

That is irrelevant to the current discussion. I am talking about what the Canadian military fights for, rather than how well it fights or how well equipped it is.

Canada's military has a history of peacekeeping and supporting humanitarian causes. It is a successful record, with many accomplishments. Such a record makes criticisms of its size and equipment trite and petty.

[Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

Canadians how do you feel that is widely know that your military is a joke?

It seems most Americans seem to think that Canada depends on the US for their very survival.

It is widely known joke that Canada will not be able to defend herself even against a third world nation.

There is this article in the Time Magazine, here is the link:

There is this quote ‘Its armed forces--once among the finest in the world--are now a bit of a joke, with equipment that keeps breaking down'. Now I will admit, US media can be fond of Canada bashing and putting down Canadians and Canada. But Time Magazine is known for being rather fair in their reporting. Canadians, how do you feel to have something like this written in the Time Magazine, a Magazine being read widely worldwide.

Even the BBC has called the Canadian military modest.

Ask any American about Canada's military, and the usual response will be does Canada has a military, or there will be the usual jokes about how pathetic it is and because it is so useless there is no need for a Canadian army.

A Reuters article once asked what happened to you Canada, in reference to Canada's military incapability and abysmal state.

Even your own Prime Minister, Harper has said that he will be rebuilding Canada's military. What does that mean, that he thinks Canada's military, they way it is now will not be able defend Canada at all against Russian, Chinese or American militaries.

One of your previous Prime Ministers, Martin offered to send 50 troops to Iraq, but President Bush said he wasn't expecting half the Canadian army!"

Obviously that is Bush being rude and insulting Canadians.

How was this allowed to happen, is it because Canadians do expect America and American soldiers to protect them in times of a military crisis. Are American soldiers your protection, if yes, Why.

So is this true, Is Canada's military as pathetic and a joke as it is widely known.

OR just an American stereotype.

I am not Canadian, personally I just always assumed Canada had a capable and strong military just because of it's good economy and being a first world nation and it's contribution militarily to troubled regions around the world.

But as I am doing research for a paper, I have not read any articles on Canada's military might. Looked at Yahoo Answers, and I get the typical jokes on Canada's military even Canadians who don't think their military is as good as it should be or that they expect Britain to come and defend them.
This are tow of the links from Yahoo Answers:

There are many more questions on the Canadian army on Yahoo Answers if you would like to read them before answering this question?

Maybe it's just because I like to think of Canada as a good place to live in, good economy and good military which is able to defend Canada. I would like to know what the world thinks about this, and so will be posting this question in a few Yahoo answers.

[Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

Stephen, You make me very proud to be a Canadian and to have the Honour of being your Mother. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

I met my Canadian Princess, although i live in England your Canada will be my Canada, i hope to do a great country a great service.............Alan bless you. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

Your views on Canada accord broadly with my observations in a recent holiday to BC as well as impressions long held, probably absorbed by osmosis over a childhood where Canada was observed in my family from afar. The development of a liberal democracy with values of inclusion, acceptance of difference, and a conscious national discourse relfected in arts media, education, public health, ecological awareness, intense dialogue with indigenous people's and independent foreign policy, I recognise from my own upbringing in New Zealand. These identifiers are complex in nature, their acquisition is not linear, they emerge over time through a nations's discussion and debate. The shifting of the poliitcal centre to a place broadly agreed by parties of the (fomer) left and right follow this. I read the comments and reactions to My Canada with curiosity, the reactions relating to the USA are kind of weird to me. But I have this observation, I now live in Australia, a country that seems to be searching for a national discourse in all the worng places. New Zealand has a strong distinct identity in comparision and it might be that this in part, had to form to differentiate it from the Australian "colonial" power. I wonder if Canada is similarly blessed, has it had to differentiate itself from it's domineering neighbor and in so doing found itself to be a liberal democracy, with distinct values allowing it to contribute something different to a wider world? [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

I LOVE [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

one of the threats and dangers for Canada is self-satisfaction, self-congratulation and self-righteousness... as far as I can tell, Canada is neither more liberal, nor more interesting than any other western country... what's so special about Canada except that it is unable to seriously recognize the so-called "First Nations" and the Québécois nation (even the UK does better with Wales and Scotland...)? and what would be so interesting about Canada as soon as Aboriginal people and Québécois would be out? Cheers mates! ps: stephen downes says that Canadians thought Quebekers dress funny (but that they would go on making a big effort to respect them)... well, many think that Canadians look and sound funny... so what do we do? [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

This, this is my Canada. My home. My love. My life. My dream.

May it always remain so!

Wnen I am away, I realise how beautiful it really is. Look forward everyday of the year to come back home for the one and half month of vacation.

Happy holidays everyone!

Dawood Subedar
Qatar Petroleum - normally resident in Ottawa, the most beautiful place in Canada. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

What a truckload of liberal horseshit. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:My Canada

Canadians are spoiled children. The United States has protected them from harm and, like any good parent, expected nothing in return. What do we get for it? Resentment. Grow up, Canadians. This must be an American. Ignorant, rude and simple-minded. In any case, I've lived all over the world, and I come back to Canada when I'm fed up with the anger. That's what Canada is; a place where you can stop being so damned angry. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

This is a fantastic article... I have been running around the internet for the past couple of hours that I can reference in a "Letter to the Editor" of the Seattle Times. Your article reads as a summary of a lot of the information I'm discovering, as well as an affirmation and inspirational piece. Your words are impressive. (BTW... the letter to the editor is in response to this article: Read it and weep... send your own letter as well.) [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

[Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

Rhoughtful and inspiring--I did not expect less. R. Berg Plymouth MA USA Please disregard minimouse. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re:My Canada

Steven, I think you are an amazing writer. Your understanding of our common nation is deep and wide, just like Canada! I appreciate your insight and your view of history. I've enjoyed your thoughts over at tacitus, and that's what brought me here. I'm a little younger than you in years, but I hope to be as educated on this fine country as yourself one day. By the way, I too have spent some time at Camp Opemikon, what a wonderful place that is! I spent two weeks there as a councellor for a bible camp in the offseason when the scouts would rent it to us! My brother and I have been having a great email chat regarding moving people from a (small c) conservative viewpoint to a more liberal (small L) viewpoint. We've concluded that people that understand compassion seem to be more liberal, those that want to measure people to some standard rulestick that shows black or white tend to be conservative. I struggle with sharing my viewpoint to others in a way so that it moves people to be more compassionate, less judgemental. I will use your writing as an example though. Thanks! Aaron [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: Re:My Canada

OK, first, I was very careful in my article to define what we stand for, and to not define 'My Canada' in terms of opposition to the United States. Yes, my point of departure was (yet another) American misconception, but the account I draw was a positive characterization that stands on its own, with no reference to contrasts to American culture and society. So this part of the criticism is completely misplaced. As for the insightful critiques offered by American readers ("thank their luck stars", "like children", "fuck yourself") I can only say that my article was not written for them or about them.

As for corporations, though my distrust - a well-earned distrust - of corporations is well known, with the exception of one sentence this article does not discuss corporations at all. I did not depict all corporations as heartless money grubbers, though with the critic I would say that some are. But again, the critic is responding to a point I did not make. As for corporations, I can only say that my article was not written for them or about them.

Finally, at no point in the article did I say Canada was perfect. Indeed, at several points, I take pains to talk about how far we have to go. I have lived on the streets in Ottawa, and I know that very real poverty persists. I have worked on First Nations reserves, and I am aware of the historical and present injustices they face. I could go on, but there is no need.

There are those, no doubt, who like the previous writer have a different view of Canada. We see this view expressed every day in the National Post. It is a view that is unabashedly pro-American and unabashedly pro-corporation. That they are a small (and declining) minority in Canada is, in my view, evident. Still they persist, and still they respond as did the previous critic, with a party line and with no apparent need to read the article they are criticizing.

[Comment] [Permalink]

Re:My Canada

I find it so sad that so many of my fellow Canadians continue to define themselves mostly as how they are different from the evil USA. Until we can get by this, and be HONEST, THOROUGH, and BALANCED in our thought processes, we cannot be leaders in the world. Leaders lead, they don't endlessly criticize what everyone else is doing. And no, ALL corporations are not led by evil heartless money grubbers (although SOME certainly are), and more than all social movements are led by self-promoting megalomaniacs who have less tolerance for dissenting thoughts than most of those who they constantly attack (although SOME certainly are.) Yes, there are many disturbing aspects of American society ... and Chinese, French, British, Russian, South African, Norwegian and Australian society as well. Oh yes, and last time I checked we weren't perfect either ... which is one of the things I love about living here. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re:My Canada

[Comment] [Permalink]

Re:My Canada

Thanks Stephen for this inspired paper, for the work you are sharing with us everyday. Gilles Beauchamp, from Montréal [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: Re:My Canada

Was that last message directed at all of us here on the forum, or to someone in particular? [Comment] [Permalink]

Re:My Canada

goandfuckyourself [Comment] [Permalink]

Vive le Canada!

I'm prompted to respond to the posts of the regretfully uninformed Americans. As a Canadian who's been living in NYC for nine years, I've had it with the omnipresent ignorance of all things not American (and all things American, actually), and the easy acceptance of government and corporate propaganda. And this is in the so-called "liberal" New York. There is little room for meaningful dissent, let alone protest demonstrations or true debate. It's sad to see a nation populated by people so unaware of how they've been indoctrinated. I can't wait to get back to a more equitable society where freedom is real. Yes, I'll pay a few more $ in taxes, but I'll get a lot more for my money. Yes, the main thing from which Canada must protect itself is the U.S. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: Re: Re: Re:My Canada

Canadians are spoiled children. The United States has protected them from harm and, like any good parent, expected nothing in return. What do we get for it? Resentment. Grow up, Canadians. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: Re: Re:My Canada

The greatest concern in the world is "who will protect us from the USA?". Views such as these are being expressed by respected media in the UK, France, Germany, Australia, Scandinavia and, of course, throughout the parts of the world broadly described as "arabic". It seems a shame to politicise your site, Stephen, but it's increasingly clear that the US is a country and a culture that desperately needs help in re-balancing itself. It is currently a malign influence and is destabilising the world, which is all the more regrettable given the powerful influence for good that it has been and could yet be. The irony is that at least some of the answers as to how to do this are literally next door: in Canada. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: Re:My Canada

Canadians should thank their lucky stars that they have Americans to protect them.

From what?

[Comment] [Permalink]

Re:My Canada

Canadians should thank their lucky stars that they have Americans to protect them. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

Althought I lived in the US for 13 years (moved back to NL a year ago), I have to say that I did not take the chance to visit Canada. Therefore I am ignorant to what is going on in Canada. The reasons I moved back to NL is basically very much based on what is written here about Canada. Real freedom. That is not how I felt in the US. When I said real freedom, not necessary that I smoke pot (which I don't), but the freedom of not having to worry about health insurance or gay and lesbian issues (which I am not either). Free to be just a good citizen. Pay my share of taxes and other contributions, and let/trust the government takes care of them in the best interest for me and my fellow citizens. I think only citizens and governments who are confident of themselves could achieve these abandon sense of freedom. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re:My Canada

I've been calling the various call centers in Canada off and on for the last few weeks to try to sort out my Canadian passport - I live in the UK. Yesterday, I was in an impatient mood which wasn't improved when the voice message I got at the end of the line told me that you folks were all on holiday. I confess I left a rude message. Please forgive me. I forgot what day it was. I won't forget again. Thank you Stephen for your extraordinary words. [Comment] [Permalink]

Re: My Canada

Having spent my university years in the U.S. and marrying an American girl 32 years ago, I've participated in many of their 4th of July celebrations. Sometimes I've envied the verbalizing of their patriotism -- the flag waving, the music. I mean, who doesn't get a bit choked up to hear 'God Bless America', or 'America the Beautiful'-- especially after 9/11. So, after last night's Canada Day celebration and fireworks, I felt a twinge of 'something's missing'. After the final explosion, the crowd politely applauded and folded up their blankets and lawn chairs, and quietly retreated back to their cars and drove home. Nobody broke out into a rousing chorus of 'O Canada'. And on the CTV news, when they interviewed the Cambridge Canada Day Parade organizer, this older veteran quietly commented on how everyone had chipped in to make it bigger this year. But no great horn-blowing or boasting. Did this mean we're not very patriotic? Or is it just the Canadian way? Well, you're eloquent article wrenched me back into the reality that this is the Canadian way. It's the quiet way we evolved into the greatness we have here today and the excitement of our future. Thank you Stephen for reminding me why I'm so proud to be Canadian. Ted Shapiro Director of Sales Desire2Learn Inc. Kitchener, ON [Comment] [Permalink]

My Canada

Stephen You express your views about Your Canada so eloquently.....I came to Canada from Guyana almost 27 years ago to attend Univeristy and your Canada became my Canada..your dream is very similiar to my dream....."I want and visualize and aspire toward a system of society and learning where each person is able to rise to his or her fullest potential without social or financial encumberance, where they may express themselves fully and without reservation through art, writing, athletics, invention, or even through their avocations or lifestyle. Where they are able to form networks of meaningful and rewarding relationships with their peers, with people who share the same interests or hobbies, the same political or religious affiliations - or different interests or affiliations, as the case may be. This to me is a society where knowledge and learning are public goods, freely created and shared, not hoarded or withheld in order to extract wealth or influence. This is what I aspire toward, this is what I work toward."...I shall copy these words and give you credit for them and place them above my desk....Happy Canada Day Stephen!! [Comment] [Permalink]

Your Comment

You can preview your comment and continue editing until you are satisfied with it. Comment will not be posted on the until you have clicked 'Done'.

Enter email to receive replies:

Your comments always remain your property, but in posting them here you agree to license under the same terms as this site CC By-NC-SA. If your comment is offensive it will be deleted.

Automated Spam-checking is in effect. If you are a registered user you may submit links and other HTML. Anonymous users cannot post links and will have their contents screened - certain words are prohibited and comments will be analyzed to make sure they make sense.