Should academics manually create course websites?
Jun 07, 2010
Commentary by Stephen Downes

David T. Jones argues that academics should not create their own websites. It's inefficient, he argues, and the outcome is of poor quality. Worse, there is limited institutional control. Instead, he recommends default course sites and wizards. All very fine, for those academics who have no interest or inclination to build their own online presence. But despite the inefficiencies, I would find myself severely constrained by an institutionally managed website. Institutions are often behind the times and use older (safer, more reliable) technology. They do not innovate. So this is one of those cases where something that is generally true should not be implemented as a policy. You can create the option for academics to use institutional website services, and most of them will. But forcing them to do so breaks the system. Total: 24
[Direct Link] 52617
Comments


Your Comment

You can preview your comment and continue editing until you are satisfied with it. Comment will not be posted on the until you have clicked 'Done'.



Enter email to receive replies:

Your comments always remain your property, but in posting them here you agree to license under the same terms as this site CC By-NC-SA. If your comment is offensive it will be deleted.

Automated Spam-checking is in effect. If you are a registered user you may submit links and other HTML. Anonymous users cannot post links and will have their contents screened - certain words are prohibited and comments will be analyzed to make sure they make sense.