- My eBooks
Ed Radio
Current song: Loading ...
Stream title:
Bit rate:
Current listeners:
Maximum listeners:
Server status:
AutoDJ status:
Source connected:
About
About Stephen Downes
About Stephen's Web
About OLDaily
Subscribe to Newsletters
gRSShopper
Threads Discussions
Privacy and Security Policy
Subscribe
Web - Today's OLDaily
Web - This Week's OLWeekly
Email - Subscribe
RSS - Individual Posts
RSS - Combined version
JSON - OLDaily
Viewer
Social Network
Stephen's Web and OLDaily
Half an Hour Blog
Google Plus Page
Twitter Feed
Flickr Photos
Huffington Post Blog
Slideshare
Blip TV
Professional
National Research Council Canada
Research Topics, Research Wiki, Code
Publications
Presentations
All My Articles
Contact
Email: stephen@downes.ca
Email: Stephen.Downes@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Skype: Downes
Blog Maverick
Posts
November 1, 2006
Support for some of the speculation I offered the other day about the Google purchase of YouTube - yes, it is a way to deal with the problem of uploaded commercial content. According to this item, the purchases revolved around a deal to compensate the networks, but without requiring that they in turn compensate the artists. The deal also works for Google because the networks then turned around and sured other video uploading services, giving Google free reign in the domain. Google gets its monopoly, the networks get to clamp down on uploading, and the artists and users get... well, nothing. Yeah, these guys are the ones lecturing us on morality. Via Lost Remote. More from Scott Karp. Ironically, the big problem in online video? Search.
[Comment] [Direct Link] [Tags: YouTube, Books, Video, Google, Networks]





